Magnetostrictive Displacement Sensor Applications: Cylinders, Moulding Machines, Rolling Mills

Magnetostrictive displacement sensors are chosen for three properties — non-contact, high precision and long life — and those properties decide where they are used: hydraulic cylinders, harsh environments and applications that cannot be serviced often. This article walks five typical application cases, then gives the pros and cons in one place.

Magnetostrictive displacement sensor application in injection moulding machine
Case 1: injection moulding machine clamp and injection travel

Five typical cases

1. In-cylinder (injection moulding, die casting, hydraulic presses)

The rod goes through the cylinder head, the ring rides on the piston, and position is read through the oil. High-frequency cycling, oil and pressure make contact solutions short-lived — non-contact magnetostrictive is the standard. In-cylinder series 16 / 19.

2. Roll gap and lift tables (steel plants)

Roll gap screwdowns and lift tables run in heat, scale dust and vibration. Use heat-rated, sealed external sensors and protect the rod from scale. External series 17 / 18.

3. Press brake slide position

Slide position decides the bend angle, so repeatability is the priority. Mount on the slide or the side cylinders and feed the value to the CNC. External, high-repeatability version.

Magnetostrictive sensor cases: press brake, TBM, steel industry
Cases 3-5: press brake, TBM thrust, steel roll gap

4. Gate opening and lift platforms

Water gate opening, stage lifts and logistics platforms need long stroke and reliability. Long-stroke external magnetostrictive is proven here — no wear, no maintenance.

5. TBM thrust cylinders (wet, vibrating, unserviceable)

Dozens of thrust cylinders push a tunnel boring machine; each carries a sensor to compute advance direction. Once installed it is very hard to service, so non-contact (no wear) and IP68 are essential. In-cylinder, IP68.

Pros and cons in one line

Pros: non-contact (no wear, long life, no maintenance), high resolution (down to 0.005 mm) and repeatability, strong resistance to oil, vibration and temperature, long stroke from tens of millimetres to metres.

Cons: higher price than a potentiometer electronic ruler, in-cylinder mounting needs the cylinder design to accept the rod, and the field around the ring must stay clean of strong magnets.

When to choose magnetostrictive

  • Accuracy requirement at 0.01 mm or better.
  • Oily, vibrating, wet or hot environment.
  • Frequent cycling or a location that is hard to service.
  • Long stroke or long-life requirement.

If the requirement is low precision and the environment is clean, a conductive plastic ruler is the economical choice — see selection method. For the heavy-industry details, see displacement sensors in five heavy industries.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Magnetostrictive or potentiometer ruler?

Magnetostrictive when precision is 0.01 mm or better, the environment is oily / vibrating / wet, or the location is hard to service. Otherwise a potentiometer ruler is cheaper.

Q: Is the magnetostrictive sensor maintenance-free?

Non-contact means no wiper wear, but the rod must stay clean of ferrous debris and the ring must not hit the mechanical ends.

Q: Can the mounting method in a case study be copied directly

Only the approach. Stroke, space, pressure and medium differ, so parts and part numbers have to be re-checked on site — copying a part number is the usual mistake.

Q: What is the weak point of a magnetostrictive sensor

One cable per axis, so multi-axis harness cost exceeds a bus, and it is not competitive on very short strokes or very low budgets. Potentiometers or LVDTs fit those cases better.

Q: Magnetostrictive or LVDT, which is better

Neither is universally better; stroke and duty decide. LVDT suits short strokes with high resolution and fast response, typically within a few hundred millimetres. Magnetostrictive wins on long strokes with simple construction, vibration tolerance and absolute output. Using both on one machine is common.

Q: Magnetostrictive versus cable extension, what is the difference

Cable extension is mechanical: a steel cable drives an encoder. It is inexpensive and flexible to mount, but the cable wears, hysteresis exists, and dust and chips are a problem. Magnetostrictive has no contact parts and stable accuracy at higher cost. Long stroke with long term stability favours magnetostrictive.

Q: Where does an LVDT outperform magnetostrictive

Four cases: very short strokes needing sub-micrometre resolution; very high frequency response for dynamic measurement; extreme temperature or radiation that the electronics head cannot survive; and tight spaces that cannot accommodate a rod and head. LVDT construction is advantageous in all four.

Q: How does it compare with a linear scale

A linear scale offers very high resolution and accuracy class, suited to precision machine tool feedback, but is sensitive to contamination and needs sealing. Magnetostrictive tolerates oil, dust and vibration with generous mounting tolerance. Choose by environment and stroke, not by headline resolution.

Whatever the question above, it comes back to the same device.magnetostrictive displacement sensorThe product range lists every series by stroke, mounting style and output interface, which is the quickest way into a selection.

← Back to News